Selling Chrome Won’t Be Enough to End Google’s Search Monopoly

You May Be Interested In:Plant Protein vs Animal Protein Benefits: Which is best for heart health | – Times of India


To dismantle Google’s illegal monopoly over how Americans search the web, the US Department of Justice wants the tech giant to end its lucrative partnership with Apple, share a trove of proprietary data with competitors and advertisers, and “promptly and fully divest Chrome,” Google’s search engine that controls over half of the US market. The government wants Google to sell Chrome to a buyer it approves, arguing the divesture would “pry open the monopolized markets to competition, remove barriers to entry, and ensure there remain no practices likely to result in unlawful monopolization.”

The recommendations are part of a detailed plan that government attorneys submitted Wednesday to US district judge Amit Mehta in Washington, DC as part of a federal antitrust case against Google that started back in 2020. By next August, Mehta is expected to decide which of the possible remedies Google will be required to carry out to loosen its stranglehold on the search market.

But the tech giant could still appeal, delaying enforcement of the judge’s order years into the future. Google has previously argued that the expected proposals would put the privacy and security of its users at risk and make its services less convenient.

Among people who have worked for Google or partnered closely with the company, there’s little agreement on whether any of the proposed remedies would significantly shift user behavior or make the search engine market more competitive. Four former Google executives who oversaw teams working on Chrome, search, and ads told WIRED that innovation by rivals, not interventions by the government, remains the surest way to unseat Google as the nation’s dominant internet search provider. “You can’t ram an inferior product down people’s throats,” says one former Chrome business leader, speaking on the condition of anonymity to protect professional relationships.

But a former Chrome engineering leader acknowledged that the search engine could have been a better product if it wasn’t beholden to Google’s other business interests. They allege that Google blocked the introduction of user-friendly features because they would have harmed the company’s advertising revenue, which depends on people clicking ads in their search results. “Why isn’t autocomplete better? Why isn’t the ‘new tab’ page’ more effective? Why isn’t browser history better?” says the ex-leader, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity. The answer: “There’s all these incentives to get users to search.” Google didn’t respond to a request for comment on the assertion.

Still, competitors that stand to benefit from even a minor reduction in Google’s power are optimistic about the expected remedies. “I can see strong benefits in putting [Chrome] back in the hands of the community,” says Guillermo Rauch, CEO of Vercel, a company that develops tools for websites, many of which depend on search traffic and advertising revenue controlled by Google. “Moderating that relationship to the corporate overlords is always going to be a healthy thing,” Rauch says.

share Paylaş facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

New Zealand: Maori protest as hikoi reaches Wellington
New Zealand: Maori protest as hikoi reaches Wellington
Does Cloud Gaming on PlayStation Portal Mark the End for Consoles?
Does Cloud Gaming on PlayStation Portal Mark the End for Consoles?
Roli’s New Instrument Is Both an AI Piano Teacher and a Digital Theremin
Roli’s New Instrument Is Both an AI Piano Teacher and a Digital Theremin
The Best Black Friday Phone Deals
The Best Black Friday Phone Deals
The Best Espresso Machines for the Home Barista
The Best Espresso Machines for the Home Barista
At-home test kit can tell you if it's flu or COVID | - Times of India
At-home test kit can tell you if it’s flu or COVID | – Times of India
24/7 Headlines | © 2024 | News